Sexual Assault Lawyer in Mississauga

Client charged with SEXUAL ASSAULT, SEXUAL INTERFERENCE and INVITATION TO TOUCH FOR SEXUAL PURPOSE by member of family. At preliminary inquiry defence cross examination of complainant revealed numerous inconsistencies and outright lies. Crown attorney WITHDREW ALL CHARGES before proceeding to trial. Peterborough Provincial Court.

Client charged with SEXUAL ASSAULT from alleged work place incident several years prior. After careful negotiations with the Crown attorney, charge against client WITHDRAWN. Orangeville Provincial Court.

Client charged with three counts of SEXUAL ASSAULT and six counts of UTTER DEATH THREAT by former spouse while going through marital separation. Defence cross examination of complainant revealed serious flaws in testimony. Client not required to testify. Client found NOT GUILTY OF ALL CHARGES. Brampton Superior Court.

Client facing charges of SEXAUL INTERFERENCE and SEXUAL ASSAULT. At trial crown agreed with defence that inconsistencies with complainantís evidence showed reasonable doubt. BOTH CHARGES WITHDRAWN at the request of the crown. Brampton Provincial Court.

Client charged with SEXUAL ASSAULT. After investigation into complainant's conduct after allegation, and, presentation to crown of complainant's online/internet communications, crown agreed to withdraw charge against client. Toronto Provincial Youth Court.

Client charged with INVITATION TO SEXUAL TOUCHING, SEXUAL ASSAULT, SEXUAL EXPLOITATION and SEXUAL INTERFERENCE. At client's preliminary inquiry, reached agreement with crown that client would plead guilty to one count of Invitation to Sexual Touching. All other charges withdrawn. Crown sought 4 year prison sentence. After detailed presentation of evidence at client's sentencing hearing, defence argument granted and client sentenced to 18 months of house arrest. Brampton Provincial Court.

Client charged with GANG SEXUAL ASSAULT, ASSAULT, and FORCIBLE CONFINEMENT. At trial, client acquitted of all charges after careful cross examination of crown witnesses, including complainant. Brampton Provincial Youth Court.

Client's charged with SEXUAL ASSAULT X 3, INVITATION TO SEXUAL TOUCHING X 3 and CRIMINAL HARASSMENT by three different complainants. All charges dismissed at trial after presentation of multiple witnesses for defence who substantiated significant discrepancies of complainants' testimony. Scarborough Provincial Court.

Client charged with SEXUAL ASSAULT, SEXUAL INTERFERENCE and INVITATION TO SEXUAL TOUCHING. Allegations from complainant were of historic nature alleged to have occurred over 10 years ago. Defence able to successfully negotiate resolution to case whereby all charges were withdrawn against client. Hamilton Provincial Court.

Client charged with 3 count of SEXUAL INTERFERENCE, THREATENING BODILY HARM, 2 counts of THREATENING DEATH, and ASSAULT. Defence able to expose major flaws in complainant's evidence and client found NOT GUILTY of all charges. Scarborough Provincial Court.